# CLAUDE.md Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed. **Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment. ## 1. Think Before Coding **Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.** Before implementing: - State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask. - If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently. - If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted. - If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask. ## 2. Simplicity First **Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.** - No features beyond what was asked. - No abstractions for single-use code. - No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested. - No error handling for impossible scenarios. - If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it. Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify. ## 3. Surgical Changes **Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.** When editing existing code: - Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting. - Don't refactor things that aren't broken. - Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently. - If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it. When your changes create orphans: - Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused. - Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked. The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request. **Exception — Tech debt must be fixed, not deferred:** When you discover a real bug, broken behavior, or technical debt while working (even if it predates this change and you didn't introduce it), fix it — do not use "not introduced by this round / pre-existing" as a reason to leave it. Surface it, then handle it. (User directive, 2026-06-25, binding.) This overrides the "don't fix what isn't broken" bias above *for genuine defects* — it does not license cosmetic refactors or unrequested rewrites. **Do it yourself — never offload work you can do (User directive, 2026-06-25, binding):** If you have the tools to do something, DO IT — never tell the user to do it for you. Read the logs yourself (`%LOCALAPPDATA%/Geomative/Geopro3/logs/geopro_*.log` via Bash/grep), inspect data/fixtures yourself, build and link yourself (`build.bat app` via PowerShell), diagnose by adding logging and then reading that log yourself. The ONLY things to ask the user for are: (a) closing a running app so the exe can relink (LNK1104 — a lock only they can release), and (b) genuine product decisions. Do not ask the user to read logs, inspect data, run diagnostics, or interpret output — that is your job. ## 4. Goal-Driven Execution **Define success criteria. Loop until verified.** Transform tasks into verifiable goals: - "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass" - "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass" - "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after" For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan: ``` 1. [Step] → verify: [check] 2. [Step] → verify: [check] 3. [Step] → verify: [check] ``` Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification. --- **These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.